<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://itservicedesk.com.au/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=TandyJorgensen1</id>
	<title> - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://itservicedesk.com.au/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=TandyJorgensen1"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://itservicedesk.com.au/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/TandyJorgensen1"/>
	<updated>2026-04-27T21:11:04Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.31.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://itservicedesk.com.au/index.php?title=Dr_DisRespect_Returns_To_Streaming_And_Breaks_Twitch&amp;diff=10000</id>
		<title>Dr DisRespect Returns To Streaming And Breaks Twitch</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://itservicedesk.com.au/index.php?title=Dr_DisRespect_Returns_To_Streaming_And_Breaks_Twitch&amp;diff=10000"/>
		<updated>2026-04-21T17:00:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TandyJorgensen1: Created page with &amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The battle royale formula was not entirely the brainchild of the PUBG Corporation - PUBG itself certainly derived content from pre-existing games - but since its success,...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The battle royale formula was not entirely the brainchild of the PUBG Corporation - PUBG itself certainly derived content from pre-existing games - but since its success, there has been a trend of other developers copying the PUBG model. The PUBG Corporation has been openly critical of titles like Fortnite in the past for seeming to be copying their formula, but the company has never fought so strongly against another title as they are now with this lawsuit against NetE&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Yet Esports tournaments seem to be a big focus (alongside loot boxes) while optimization and dealing with hackers has fallen by the wayside,  [https://Resumesarea.com/ Resumesarea.Com] at least in terms of perception by active players. It&amp;#039;s why we stopped playing over the last two weeks (the hackers and awful in-game reward syst&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The developer goes on to note that in PlayerUnknown&amp;#039;s Battlegrounds , players must &amp;quot;visually detect&amp;quot; other players because of the lack of player indicators seen in other shooter games. PUBG Corp. is using this particular section of the lawsuit to assert that games like Rules of Survival have also ripped off the style of cosmetics offered by PlayerUnknown&amp;#039;s Battlegrounds . These cosmetic similarities, the developer appears to suggest, should be taken seriously because they actively impact the core, PUBG gameplay experience. It also argues that the visual design of these cosmetics is a &amp;quot;protectable&amp;quot; w&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Since PlayerUnknown&amp;#039;s Battlegrounds does sell loot crates - with some players also willing to pay excessive amounts of money for in-game cosmetics - some will also wonder whether PUBG deserves to be included in the pay-to-win deb&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;We just implemented ping-based matchmaking which really has improved the gameplay experience for a lot of players. It&amp;#039;s working out quite well and we&amp;#039;re still doing research. We have the data team looking into it and trying to improve it. And that&amp;#039;s the goal with the game, to keep improving it over this year and the next year and the next ten yea&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The lawsuit does cite a number of specific instances, however, including a particular &amp;quot;rural aqueduct&amp;quot; that appears in both titles, the use of a frying pan as a weapon, certain armour or weapon parts cited as &amp;quot;near-exact copies,&amp;quot; and the repeated use of the phrase &amp;quot;winner winner chicken dinner,&amp;quot; which was used in marketing material for NetEase&amp;#039;s two games. NetEase was involved in a legal case alleging copyright infringement last year , but ironically, in that case they were the ones filing the suit alongside Blizzard, against a Chinese clone of Overwatch. NetEase actually oversees the Chinese localization of the Blizzard ti&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Where Fortnite has significant updates on the content front, including fun new modes, seemingly every week, PUBG still barely runs on Xbox One and hasn&amp;#039;t done anything of note on PC since launching out of early access. For this reason, in the last few weeks Fornite&amp;#039;s popularity has skyrocketed while also earning mainstream buzz - positive buzz - something PUBG is starting to losing a little steam on for the first time in its young l&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;PlayerUnknown&amp;#039;s Battlegrounds&amp;#039; developers, PUBG Corp., will no longer be tolerating some of these knock-off titles. The company, which is owned by the Korean publisher Bluehole, filed a lawsuit on the 2nd of April in the US District Court of Northern California against Chinese publisher NetEase, who published a pair of highly derivative smartphone titles called Rules of Survival and Knives Out that look and play extremely similarly to PUBG . The lawsuit accuses NetEase of both copyright and trademark violations in the two copycat tit&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Last week, PlayerUnknown&amp;#039;s Battlegrounds developer PUBG Corp. launched a potentially industry-shaking lawsuit against NetEase , the creator of several battle royale mobile clones. The company accused NetEase, the Chinese publisher behind battle royale games such as Rules of Survival and Knives Out , of violating copyright and trademarks it holds PlayerUnknown&amp;#039;s Battlegroun&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;However, as PUBG Corp&amp;#039;s comments about the Ghillie suit note, certain cosmetics can be used to benefit players, by camouflaging them in certain areas of a map . PUBG Corp. may have only identified the Ghillie suit as a beneficial piece of loot, but what of the other cosmetic content that players can collect in paid-for cra&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;In today&amp;#039;s gaming market, it is rather common for a highly successful release like PlayerUnknown&amp;#039;s Battlegrounds to be followed by an array of derivative clones, mostly on mobile platforms, made by developers hoping to profit from the game&amp;#039;s succ&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Taking all of this into consideration, it looks as if PlayerUnknown&amp;#039;s Battlegrounds will not be region locking China any time soon in an effort to discourage cheaters. So, hopefully the aforementioned efforts on behalf of PUBG Corp. and Tencent will manage to stymie the unethical practice in the long run, if not end it altoget&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Dr DisRespect finally made his return to Twitch.tv today, and in the process managed to take the platform down. The streamer, whose real name is Guy Beahm, is one of the most popular around, and his caustic personality has gelled well with Twitch users. He&amp;#039;s the (self-proclaimed) &amp;quot;face of Twitch&amp;quot; after all! The former video game developer has managed to pull in huge numbers with his PlayerUnknown&amp;#039;s Battlegrounds streams, leading to the doctor becoming one of the biggest Twitch celebrities and winner of two awards for it last y&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TandyJorgensen1</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>